🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various politicians to copy this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond the West, further countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of Australia and others show that governments globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.